EU nuclear agency sees some Russia imports up again in 2023 from before Ukraine war

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A view shows cooling towers for new third unit at the Mochovce Nuclear Power Plant, in Mochovce, Slovakia, September 12, 2022. REUTERS/Radovan Stoklasa/File Photo

By Gabriela Baczynska

BRUSSELS (Reuters) -European Union increased imports from Russia of nuclear fuel and services for the bloc’s Russian-designed reactors again in 2023 compared to 2021, the year before Moscow invaded Ukraine, Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) said.

While such imports are not subject to EU sanctions, the bloc aims to reduce its dependence on Moscow. Its overall imports from Russia’s nuclear energy industry held steady last year despite rising demand for nuclear power driven by high energy costs and a push to cut carbon emissions.

However, five EU states that operate so-called VVER reactors were likely to exceed 2021 import levels this year again after a rise in 2022, ESA’s acting head told Reuters in an interview.

The trend highlights challenges EU faces in reaching its long-term goal of achieving VVER fuel self-sufficiency.

“Imports by countries operating Russia-designed VVER reactors grew in 2022 compared to 2021, and they will have likely grown in 2023 compared to the year before the Russian invasion,” Stefano Ciccarello said in remarks cleared for release on Friday.

Last year, those five countries – Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Finland, Hungary and Slovakia – bought 30% more conversion services from Russia and 22% more enrichment, ESA said in its annual report in October.

“Those utilities are building additional inventories of fresh fuel. Further advance purchases will most likely contribute in the short-term to more material coming to VVER utilities from Russia in comparison to 2021,” he said.

Ciccarello did not offer specific numbers and said it was too early to say whether 2023 imports would be also higher than last year.

Of the five EU countries hitherto fully reliant on Russian supplies only Hungary has yet to sign contracts for alternative fuel, according to ESA. The Hungarian government did not reply to a request for comment on Friday.

Finland’s Fortum said its work with U.S. Westinghouse on alternative fuel was going well and added: “Taking the new fuel into use is a multi-year project requiring regulatory approvals.”

LONG EFFORT

Overall, EU imports of natural uranium and related services from Russia were largely flat year-on-year in 2022, as utilities’ divergent strategies evened out, said ESA.

“Those that are not reliant on Russia are trying to further reduce any such dependence,” said Ciccarello.

“On the other hand, there are those fully dependent on Russian fuel who are increasing fuel stocks as contingency for any break in supplies before alternative fuel is licensed.”

Nuclear power accounts for nearly 10% of energy consumed in the EU, with France meeting nearly a third of its energy needs that way. Other major producers include Sweden and Belgium.

EU imports of natural uranium from Russia fell 16% last year from 2021, a drop compensated by increase in deliveries from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, ESA said.

In 2022, the EU’s Russian nuclear energy imports were worth around 750 million euros ($823 mln), or 1% of the bloc’s Russian gas imports, according the European Commission.

EU countries are now debating a Commission proposal for the 12th package of economic sanctions against Russia in response to its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Sources said, however, that the proposal – which is not public – does not include sanctions on Russia’s nuclear energy industry.

Imposing EU sanctions requires unanimity of all the 27 members of the bloc, something Hungary – where Russia’s state monopoly Rosatom is contracted to extend the Paks nuclear plant – refuses to grant in the case of Russia’s nuclear energy.

Beyond Europe, Russia last year was the third-largest uranium supplier for the United States, which has the most reactors in the world. The fate of bills to ban Russian uranium submitted to the U.S. Congress is uncertain.

Ciccarello said the West would need to add 20-30% to its existing scope for conversion and enrichment to make up for high-risk supplies. Upgrades expected to go online late this decade would not cover Western demand, he said.

“This is massive investment with duration of several decades,” said Ciccarello. “For further investments, the industry seeks some form of guaranteed market.”