en English
en Englishfr Frenchde Germanit Italianru Russianes Spanish

Top US utility group opposes emissions plan for existing gas plants-source

Top US utility group opposes emissions plan for existing gas plants-source By Reuters

Breaking News

‘;

Commodities

Published Jul 31, 2023 10:48PM ET

(C) Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A power plant is seen by the Mississippi River in Muscatine, Iowa, U.S., January 28, 2020. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

(Reuters) – The top U.S. utility lobby group intends to push back on the Biden administration’s proposals requiring upgrades to existing natural gas-fired power plants to curb climate-warming emissions, two sources familiar with the matter said on Monday.

Resistance from the Edison Electric Institute (EEI), which represents investor-owned utilities that serve 250 million people, to the proposal could pose a problem for U.S. President Joe Biden’s plan to decarbonize the country’s power sector by 2035 – a critical pillar of his climate change agenda.

The power industry accounts for a quarter of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, second only to transportation, according to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) data.

The EPA’s plan would require large existing natural gas-fired plants that run at least 50% of the time to install carbon capture by 2035 or co-fire with 30% hydrogen by 2032.

The rules would also regulate coal and new natural gas plants separately.

EEI said it was still finalizing its comments on the proposed rule and would not provide specifics.

“There are elements of the proposal that are favorable, and we are making recommendations to strengthen them; elements that are fixable with additional flexibilities; and elements that miss the mark,” EEI spokesperson Brian Reil said in a statement.

Areas of concern include regulations that would mandate a timeline for deploying carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems to suck up carbon emissions, according to a source briefed on EEI’s draft comments.

The group stated in a white paper in April, before EPA’s proposal was released, that “there are significantly fewer levers for technical and technological improvement for natural-gas based units when compared to coal-based units.”

It also said retrofitting those plants for CCS would be “difficult” due to space constraints and other limitations.

The second source familiar with the industry’s draft comments questioned why utilities are pushing back against the rules when they are already deploying technologies including CCS and hydrogen.

EEI and others have until Aug. 8 to submit comments on the proposed rules. The final rule will likely take about a year to be finalized.

EPA said it “looks forward to reviewing comments and constructively engaging with stakeholders as we work to finalize the proposed standards.”

Top US utility group opposes emissions plan for existing gas plants-source

Our Apps



Terms And Conditions
Privacy Policy
Risk Warning
Do not sell my personal information

(C) 2007-2023 Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous post Nifty News: Yuga Labs to buy metaverse studio, Etihad NFT staking to take off and more
Next post Base’s largest DEX LeetSwap halts trading amid exploit concerns